|
|
Post by ydoaPs on Dec 9, 2009 21:49:12 GMT
Enjoy and try not to shoot milk out your nose.
|
|
naz
Full Member
SYNTHEIST
Posts: 245
|
Post by naz on Dec 9, 2009 23:10:44 GMT
Enjoy and try not to shoot milk out your nose. Bible University??? Is this one of the pictures hanging on the walls there?  |
|
|
|
Post by AdrenalinTim on Dec 9, 2009 23:15:16 GMT
Enjoy and try not to shoot milk out your nose. This is great entertainment. Zoroastrianism "is still prominent today". (p.23-24) |
|
|
|
Post by AdrenalinTim on Dec 9, 2009 23:19:44 GMT
Oh wow, I didn't know Hovind was a King James version-only nutter. He goes off on a rant against modern translations on pp26-27.
|
|
|
|
Post by AdrenalinTim on Dec 9, 2009 23:23:00 GMT
Stupider and stupider.
"The god of Mohammedism [sic] (...) is a little pantheistic god of nature [sic]. Because of this, the Islam religion [sic] accepts evolution very readily as a scientific fact because it fits so well with their teaching." (29)
|
|
|
|
Post by AdrenalinTim on Dec 9, 2009 23:36:36 GMT
"Darwin's book was just what the world needed to justify the cruel ruthless tactics of the industrial revolution. Darwin had a theology degree." (36)
This is horrendous. The writing quality is approximately 5th-grade level. Doctoral dissertation my ass. No wonder this has been suppressed by Hovind and PBU.
|
|
|
|
Post by AdrenalinTim on Dec 9, 2009 23:41:52 GMT
"Because of [Alfred Russell] Wallace's spiritist, pantheist, and occultist teaching of evolution, he could really be considered the founding father of the New Age movement." (40)
|
|
|
|
Post by AdrenalinTim on Dec 9, 2009 23:54:48 GMT
The "option" he advocates for teaching in schools is "to leave both of these beliefs [evolution and creationism] out of the public school system. I taught high school science and mathematics. I know that you can teach students many things without mentioning origins and where we came from. It is possible to leave the issue totally up to the home or to the church." (50)
|
|
|
|
Post by ydoaPs on Dec 10, 2009 0:04:52 GMT
I said it was funny.
|
|
|
|
Post by AdrenalinTim on Dec 10, 2009 0:11:12 GMT
Huh. Pages 51-52 is almost identical with pp 61-62. He just piles stuff on his word salad with no regard for whether he's already said it. There's no progression from one point to the next, there's plenty of quote-mining and unsourced quotes (everything, actually: there's neither a bibliography nor footnotes).
|
|
|
|
Post by AdrenalinTim on Dec 10, 2009 0:15:28 GMT
"[C]anaries will never, given all the time you want, will never [sic] change into elephants, or dinosaurs, or trees, or tomatoes. If they did, that would be macro-evolution." (63)
|
|
|
|
Post by AdrenalinTim on Dec 10, 2009 0:23:33 GMT
"It is just a religion." (65)
"But that is just their faith." (65)
"Evolution is just a religion." (66)
"[E]volution is just a religion, and not scientific" (66)
"Evolution is their faith" (66)
"It is their religion versus my religion." (67)
"It is not science versus religion; it is religion versus religion. Both of them are simply religious beliefs." (67)
One wonders who he's trying to convince.
|
|
|
|
Post by AdrenalinTim on Dec 10, 2009 0:45:22 GMT
"Ken Taylors' Living Bible, I don'the garbage heap. want to be too negative because there are many good things about it, in Genesis has an attempt to pacify the evolutionists by trying to include billions of years into the Bible framework." (101, all errors sic)
|
|
|
|
Post by AdrenalinTim on Dec 10, 2009 0:47:08 GMT
I am now much stupider for having read that. But it was a good laugh.
|
|
|
|
Post by mitchleblanc on Dec 10, 2009 1:46:40 GMT
LOL! This is gold.
|
|
